Why don’t mourners do geometry? St Maximus the Confessor and St Gregory the Theologian’s Oration 27
نویسندگان
چکیده
The paper deals with St Maximus? Ambiguum 14 in which this Byzantine theologian interprets a paragraph from the famous First theological oration of Gregory Theologian. By way comparison, Cappadocian states that Eunomian discussions are misplaced same manner as doing geometry would be time mourning. Maximus faced rather difficult task interpreting odd comparison. In response to challenge, he offered several different interpretations, admitting grateful anyone who might offer better solution ambiguity. Some scholars dealt text criticism very did precisely by suggesting ?the geometry? (?????????) represented lapsus calami replaced original phrase immoderate laughter? (???? ???????), while others refused accept their proposal. Reflections conclusion on authority present patristic texts, both case well contemporary scholars.
منابع مشابه
[St Leopold Mandić: a cripple who became a charismatic confessor].
The first part of this article presents in detail the life of the Croatian Capuchin St Leopold Bogdan Mandić (Herceg Novi, 1866 - Padova, 1942). Follows a discussion about the relation between his disability and medicine, including paranormal phenomena recorded during his life on earth. The article concludes with a note that the Holy See has recognised an outstanding number of healing miracles ...
متن کاملValidity and Reliability of the Persian Version of the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire for COPD
Background and Objective: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common disease that causes 6% of deaths, 90% of which occur in low- and middle-income countries. Improving these patients' quality of life (QOL) is one of the primary treatment goals. The St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) is used to measure the health status of patients with respiratory problems. This resear...
متن کاملرواداری در نظریه ی ST
چکیده: کوبرروز و دیگران (2012) نظریه ای در باب ابهام پرورانده اند که طی آن مدلی برای رواداری ارائه کنند. قصد بر این است که در این مدل رواداری معتبر باشد؛ چنین نباشد که یک محمول مبهم بر هر چیزی حمل شود؛ و نیز استدلال های پارادوکس خرمن معتبر نباشند. در این مقاله استدلال خواهد شد که اولا، تحدید ایشان از اصل رواداری از آنچه در ادبیات مربوط به ابهام مورد توافق است فاصله می گیرد. و ثانیا، نظریه ایشان...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Zbornik Matice srpske za društvene nauke
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['0352-5732', '2406-0836']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/zmsdn2177079j